30 Russian Short.įeaturing a rimless and highly tapered case to assist with reliable feeding and extraction, the cartridge was a big hit with the Soviet Army from the start. Over the years, the cartridge has sometimes been referred to as the 7.62 Soviet, the 7.62 Short, the 7.62 Warsaw Pact, and the.
#ACCURATE 5 VS 7 FULL#
311″ 123 grain boat tail full metal jacket (FMJ) bullet at a muzzle velocity of 2,300 feet per second (1,445 foot pounds of energy). The resulting 7.62x39mm (M43) cartridge fired a. However, the performance of the StG 44 and 7.92x33mm Kurtz impressed the Soviets so much that they decided to develop a similar rifle and cartridge. The Germans introduced the new weapon and cartridge too late in the war and in numbers too small to change the final outcome of WWII. The Germans developed the StG 44 rifle and the accompanying 7.92x33mm Kurtz cartridge during World War II to fulfill that gap in capability. In short, they wanted an intermediate cartridge with more power and a longer effective range than a pistol cartridge, but without the power and recoil of a full-powered rifle cartridge. Since typical combat ranges were typically between 100 and 300 yards, military leaders recognized the need for an intermediate power cartridge to fill the gap between pistol cartridges and full-powered rifle cartridges. Those sub-machineguns were very effective at close range and were much easier to control during fully automatic fire, but they didn’t have nearly as much stopping power or as long of an effective range as full-powered rifle cartridges. 45 ACP, the Germans equipped some of their Soldiers with the MP-40 chambered in 9mm Luger, and the Soviets used PPSh chambered in 7.62x25mm Tokarev. For instance, the American Army utilized the Thompson and M3 sub-machineguns chambered in. Recognizing the shortcomings of their primary infantry rifles, the various armies supplemented those rifles with sub-machine guns chambered in pistol cartridges. They also tended to be long, cumbersome, and unwieldy when used for close quarters fighting. While those rifle cartridges were quite powerful and had a relatively long effective range, they also produced a lot of recoil and were challenging to handle in a fully automatic rifle. 303 British, and 7.92x57mm Mauser at the beginning of World War II. The major powers equipped most of their troops with rifles chambered in full-power cartridges like the. Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get started.
#ACCURATE 5 VS 7 FREE#
This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. This means I will earn a small commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase. Second, some of the links below are affiliate links. 223 Remington and 5.56x45mm NATO cartridges, read this article: 223 Remington with its NATO cousins though.įor a more detailed discussion on the differences between the. Use extreme caution when attempting to interchange the.
223 vs 5.56 is very small and doesn’t make any difference for the purposes of this article.
223 Remington and the 5.56x45mm NATO are technically different cartridges, the practical difference in performance between the. In this article, I’m going to do my best to sort through the 223/5.56 vs 7.62x39mm debate in an even handed manner in order to help you make an informed decision on which one is right for you.īefore we get started, I have two administrative notes:įirst, though the. However, the 5.56 vs 7.62x39mm debate can be particularly difficult to navigate due to the large number of misconceptions and myths that abound regarding the cartridges. Many shooters and hunters probably agree that the 5.56x45mm NATO and 7.62×39 are both effective cartridges for accomplishing specific tasks. The 5.56 vs 7.62x39mm debate kicked off shortly thereafter and has never really ended as shooters continue to intensely argue the strengths and weaknesses of each cartridge in sporting goods shops, gun magazines, online forums, and shooting ranges across the country. Here’s what you need to know about the 5.56 vs 7.62x39mm debate.įighters armed with the 5.56x45mm NATO and the 7.62x39mm have engaged in furious combat all over the world ever since military forces using those cartridges first met in the jungles of Vietnam during the 1960s. While they’re useful cartridges in certain situations, there are different pros and cons associated with using the.
0 kommentar(er)
